White v. Regester (1973) Oyez Oyez Oh Yay!
White V Regester Decision. Regester united states supreme court 412 u.s. Sanders that members of the u.s.
Follow this and additional works at: Regester (1973) case summary in 1964, the u. Web white appellee regester docket no. House of representatives must be. Regester case was a critical test of applying the voting rights act to existing and new state laws. Regester petitioner:white respondent:regester location:allegheny county district court docket no.: The reasoning behind the ruling of the court would be. Sanders that members of the u.s. Names white, byron raymond (judge) supreme court of the united states (author) created / published 1972 headings. District court’s judgment on the first.
Multimember districts are not per se unconstitutional, nor are they necessarily. 755 (1973), there was no evidence that negroes faced official obstacles to registration, voting, and running for office, yet we upheld a. Web law school case brief white v. Web the white v. Multimember districts are not per se unconstitutional, nor are they necessarily. Web this case raises two questions concerning the validity of the reapportionment plan for the texas house of representatives adopted in 1970 by the state legislative redistricting. Regester petitioner:white respondent:regester location:allegheny county district court docket no.: District court’s judgment on the first. This case the supreme court declared the 1970 reapportionment plan was unconstitutional for discrimination against racial and ethnic groups. Names white, byron raymond (judge) supreme court of the united states (author) created / published 1972 headings. Web white appellee regester docket no.
